InvestorIdeas.com | big ideas for the small cap investor

search subscribe advertise submitnews

   research       membership       insiders corner       investor alerts       audio       marketplace       green investor       stock directories       trading center       JOBS     


AddThis Social Bookmark Button


A Sporting Chance at Market Gains

By Michael Brush   
November 10, 2005

The home of well-known brands in sports like Spalding, Huffy and American Athletics, the Atlanta-based Russell (RML) makes apparel and equipment used by some of the finest athletes around.

But when it comes to running a business, Russell looks more like a third-string bench warmer.

Since July, shares of the company have gotten clubbed because of a series of logistical mishaps -- plus a few hurricanes. The stock fell below $13 in late October from above $21 last July. Recently it struggled to climb back up above $15.

advertisement


No one can predict that hurricanes won’t ever disrupt Russell’s supply chain in the future. But when you look at the Keystone Cops kind of logistical snafus that have benched the stock, you have to think that a little focus by management could easily turn this company into a champion once again.

After all, most of the problems plaguing Russell seem fixable. This might explain why insiders themselves stepped up and bought around $200,000 worth of stock in the sell off at prices at about $13.60.

Take a look at the snafus that management says tripped up the company, and judge for yourself.

* Hoodwinked by hoodies. Coming into 2005, Russell duly bulked up on popular hooded sweatshirts. But by late spring it noticed an unusual surge in demand for hoodies, which customers preferred over the traditional crew neck cut. Russell tried to shift production. But it says it didn’t have enough workers trained to produce hoodies, which are more complicated to assemble. That left a lot of demand unmet.

* Fleeced by fleece. Likewise, a new Russell line for this fall, known as brushed fleece, was well received in pre-season tryouts. Russell aggressively sold the line ahead of time. But quality issues cropped up in production, and the company failed to meet demand.

* Pounded by price cuts. Meanwhile, competitive pricing this year in “art wear” – or casual wear with stamped patterns and logos – boosted demand for clothing produced under Russell’s Jerzees brand. The company says it had trouble tweaking production to meet the surge in demand, partly because of tight labor markets.

* Hurtin’ in Honduras. Many of these challenges cropped up while Russell was in the midst of bringing a new plant on line in Honduras – not a good time for the marketplace to ask you to shift gears quickly.

* Haunted by hurricanes. Then came Hurricane Katrina. Russell lost more than forty containers of goods. Even worse, it lost access to the ports it used to ship fabric to contractors in Central America and the Caribbean, and bring finished goods back to the U.S.

* Panicked over polyester. Because of the hurricane, polyester producers invoked contract clauses that allowed them to cram a 20% price increase on buyers, including Russell.

* Whacked by Washington. Meanwhile, delays in the implementation of the Central American Free Trade Agreement meant Russell had to pay higher tariffs than it expected.

Now if all this sounds like the typical litany of excuses that company trot out whenever they want to cover up mismanagement, I don’t blame you. Many investors thought the same thing, apparently, and bailed. On the other hand, would insiders really have bought stock, knowing they were publicly using a string of empty excuses to cover up a rotten business? I doubt it.

About the only thing that went wrong last quarter that may be hard to fix was a decision by Wal-Mart (WMT) decided to stop carrying the Jerzees fleece products for boys. That hurts.

But Wal-Mart will continue with the men’s line of fleece products. More importantly, Russell is still the number-one domestic supplier of team game and practice uniforms – it is a big player in the college space. And it has leading brands in active wear, hunting apparel, athletic footwear, and women’s sports apparel, thanks to an acquisition campaign over the past several years. Those strengths aren’t going away because of a quarter or two of logistical mishaps.

The bottom line: Like the insiders, I’d bet that Russell can figure out how to overcome the logistical challenges, and have enough luck not to get hammered by hurricanes again any time soon. Meanwhile, the stock is cheap. Russell trades below book value, and it carries a miniscule price to sales ratio of .35. It also has a forward price earnings ratio of about ten. Historically, it has traded for about eighteen times earnings. That’s a discount that’s hard to resist in a retailer with a stable of solid brands.

Disclaimer

At the time of publication, Michael Brush did not own or control shares in any of the companies listed in this column. Mr. Brush is an independent columnist for this web site.

For more on Insiders Corner disclosure, see the disclosure section in About Insiders Corner: http://www.investorideas.com/insiderscorner/. InvestorIdeas.com Disclaimer: www.InvestorIdeas.com/About/Disclaimer.asp. InvestorIdeas is not affiliated or compensated by the companies mentioned in this article.



TOP

ECON Corporate Services, Inc.

© 2000 - 2008 InvestorIdeas.com®, ECON

about us | partners / links | company showcase | contact | employment | disclaimer | privacy policy | sitemap